Now we all know that I, as an American, eat food with unnatural stuff such as chemicals and sugar. Meats in most cases have growth hormones, and fruits and vegetables in a lot of cases are sprayed with what is called poison ( things like DDT).
The question is: farmed-raised fish are better or worse for the human body than fresh-caught fish that may have plastics in them and even perhaps diseases that are undetected and natural chemicals that the fish produce. The same is true for farm animals; raw vegetation from the ground that the animals eat may stay with the animal, and we, the eater, may be consuming it in our bodies. What about the growth hormones that are given to livestock? Are they really and truly harmful to us humans, and if not, do these hormones make for a tastier and healthier food? Let’s not forget about the pesticides that are used; how dangerous are they to us humans? Do we need to eat a tremendous amount or even a little amount of dangerous food? What if we don’t use pesticides? Would we have enough vegetables ? What about the bread that we Americans eat that doesn’t come from the bakery?Does the chemical that we put into our industrial process bread hurt us or because it saves the shelf life of bread and prevents things like mold from happening sooner than later?
**********************************************************************************
Fresh bread from a good bakery tastes much better than grocery store bread. Wild-caught fish seems to have a better flavor to them. Natural-raised livestock when not starving, in my opinion, have a slightly better flavor. The same is true for fresh fruits and vegetables that don’t have pesticides on them; they taste better.
No comments:
Post a Comment