Steve's barking It's a budget stupid

I maybe not know that much about budgets, but I do know that a counties budget has everything to do with money that a the counties government is going to spend. Question; how do you hold up a budget on money that you're not going to spend. Maybe I'm putting it wrong let's ask how can you insist on not paying for something that your not suppose to pay for anyway?
Now in case anybody is reading this I'm writing about the affordable health care act. Now I'm no lawyer but you can't insist that on refunding or holding up a portion of a law that the government isn't funding.
Now I haven't seen the funding bill, but if my gut feeling is right the senate could except the money part of the bill and change the wording.
Now I know that the budget bill is a zillion pages long and nobody really knows what in it anyway, but (and g-d forgive me) if medicaid spending is X plus Y (for the affordable health care) don't fund Y.  Even if that money is from saving on the amount of money not being paid to doctors and hospitals, just deduct the savings.


Thank goodness progressives don't read my blog and neither do the fruitcakes.
A person must take this particular blog with a grain of salt, for I get all my information from the news.

Steve's barking at awt

Now one can say that my wife is an angry black woman, but at least she gets things done.
Now what can one say about angry white trash, they get things undone. Their scared of anything that's new.
Who do I considered angry white trash, The Donald, lots of the commentators on cable news and financial shows and any other clod who whats to take the world back to before 1776.

I can't help but think of Issac Newton saying about countries economics, those who stay at rest tend to stay at rest (in other words nothing happens when one does nothing) and every  austerity measure has an equal but violent reaction.

*Newtons actually statement on the law of physics a body at rest tends to stay at rest, every action has an opposite reaction.

Steve's barking at the 10 amendment

The powers not delegated to the the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. 
That's the exact wording of the tenth amendment to to Constitution. This amendment just like ever other amendment and the original Constitution before the amendments is pretty straight forward. Well it was until lawyers and Jurist tried and found secret meaning to it.
The tenth amendment means that the state can set laws that aren't set in the Constitution such as trying some one for murder or robbery. Now I must be a fool but there is no way that the tenth amendment give states right over the federal government as long as it stated in the Constitution. Of cause 150 and years ago we fought a bloody civil war over this article and those who though that citizens of  one state could bring it's laws into the territories and the federal government had no say in the matter. Those states righter's  lost, or so the history books claim.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble, and to petition the government to redress of the grievances.
That's the first amendment. Now the way I read this amendment, it limits what the federal government can do.
Now if Montana wants to limit the amount of money that be spent on an election it can do so, for there is nothing in the Constitution to prohibit them.


Do we really have freedom of religion, press and speech, yes from the federal government but states and local government can if not by fact then by the constitution.

Steve's barking at Rush Limbaugh behaving like Joan Rivers

Meow
That's the sound of Rush Limbaugh talking on the radio.
I don't understand,or maybe I do Mr. Limbaugh thinks himself as a comedian, kind of a male version Joan Rivers. I don't think he's very good at it, because most of his listeners take him very seriously.
If I would to take him seriously I'd probably question his sexuality, because of his initial statements on that MS Fluke. Given that most heterosexual men would love to have the woman take responsibility as to not pregnant, and if the government helps pay for it so what.Later he said that he would like MS fluke to record her self having sex with a man, perhaps it's because he wants to see a naked man. ( That's my meow moment).