What is idiot savant TV?
Idiot savant TV are the talking heads on business and other disinformation news programs. Let me use the term news discussion programs and business discussion programs.The idiot savants are those talking heads who were hired because they were quite good at something that might have pertained to a business model or were good at guessing which stock would rise and fall. When it comes to knowing general knowledge of economics or history forget about it.
Several days ago I heard a comment from one of those idiot savant's calling a well known economist a communist because he dared call out a female anchor on another station saying that she was wrong in saying that the feds easing of money was driving up commodity prices such as oil and food prices. Now I'm not a communist and I know that speculators and possibly the oil company's themselves are driving up oil prices and we are now in a severe drought, lack of food stuff pushes the prices up. Now this business news annalist (?) complained about us bloggers saying anything weather it's true or not, I guess he doesn't listen to himself or most of the economic annalists on his station. or for that matter any of those blathering idiots on what is loosely called cable news.
Getting back to idiot savants on the telly, there's this guy they called the Donald whom is the star of this program called the apprentice. Now he makes great office buildings, golf courses and high rise coops, but when it comes to common sense he's two brick shy of a full load. (He has no common sense).To hear this guy talk about the president's birth certificate as to say that he's not qualified for the office of the president because the Constitution states that only natural born citizen can be the president. Legal scholars have stated that children of citizens of the US are natural born citizens. George Romney in in '68 and McCain in '08.
Speaking of the Donald, why doesn't he have any dignity, he hawks more products then Kim Kardashion and the cast of Jersey Shore combined. I'm not that savvy in business but I would imagine that it would cheapen his brand.
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
Steve's barking two extra tears on 9/11
I'm shedding two extra tears on this 9/11 for two friends and ex coworkers who died of lung cancer this year.
They both worked near the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001. Nether smoked.
Robert Rebasti and John Biondo I did not forget you.
They both worked near the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001. Nether smoked.
Robert Rebasti and John Biondo I did not forget you.
Steve's barking at those who talk to dead people
There is many a person in this great land that I live in that talk to dead people.
They call these dead people the founding fathers.
Now how do I know that these people talk to dead people. Most of them state what the Constitution of the United States means not what it says.(1) Now I always understood that a well regulated militia means just that a militia (what is now called the national guard) is regulated, presumably by the state.It's not some willy nilly law that every man should have a gun to protect themselves from tyranny of a central government .
Yes some of our founding father wrote letters to that effect, but other wrote letters just the opposite. Being that there is no written record of the debates that went into the second amendment those who claim that that's what our founding fathers meant must talk to dead people.
Those people who claim that the founding fathers wanted the US to be a god fearing nation must based on a couple of letters from several founding fathers, while there is a letter calling one person in particular (Jefferson by Hamilton) a damn atheist. To get to the truth one must hold a seance and talk to all those who might be called our founding fathers, those well known and those not so well known.
Now there are even some people who claim that our founding fathers wanted this to be a capitalist state even though the idea of capitalism and socialism hadn't evolved yet. The only way one could know what the founding fathers really would think of this what kind of economic system this country should have again by having a seance.
Now it isn't what we would consider dumb people who believe that by reading a couple a letters from a few of our early law givers, they know what they meant not the literal meanings to the words and paragraphs to the Constitution, our most learned conservative judge states that the Constitution isn't a living instrument so he therefore makes his rulings on what he claims what the writers of the Constitution meant not to they wrote.
(1)A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. ( The second amendment to the constitution).
* Think of Shay's rebellion all you American history buffs. It's as good as any reason for the wording of the second amendment.
They call these dead people the founding fathers.
Now how do I know that these people talk to dead people. Most of them state what the Constitution of the United States means not what it says.(1) Now I always understood that a well regulated militia means just that a militia (what is now called the national guard) is regulated, presumably by the state.It's not some willy nilly law that every man should have a gun to protect themselves from tyranny of a central government .
Yes some of our founding father wrote letters to that effect, but other wrote letters just the opposite. Being that there is no written record of the debates that went into the second amendment those who claim that that's what our founding fathers meant must talk to dead people.
Those people who claim that the founding fathers wanted the US to be a god fearing nation must based on a couple of letters from several founding fathers, while there is a letter calling one person in particular (Jefferson by Hamilton) a damn atheist. To get to the truth one must hold a seance and talk to all those who might be called our founding fathers, those well known and those not so well known.
Now there are even some people who claim that our founding fathers wanted this to be a capitalist state even though the idea of capitalism and socialism hadn't evolved yet. The only way one could know what the founding fathers really would think of this what kind of economic system this country should have again by having a seance.
Now it isn't what we would consider dumb people who believe that by reading a couple a letters from a few of our early law givers, they know what they meant not the literal meanings to the words and paragraphs to the Constitution, our most learned conservative judge states that the Constitution isn't a living instrument so he therefore makes his rulings on what he claims what the writers of the Constitution meant not to they wrote.
(1)A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. ( The second amendment to the constitution).
* Think of Shay's rebellion all you American history buffs. It's as good as any reason for the wording of the second amendment.
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Steve"s barking at the US election
Looks like the election comes down to ABO vs Oh No, not those A Holes.
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Steve's Barking at the stimulus god, she must be crazy
New York's home town newspaper (THE DAILY NEWS) as she calls herself reported that the city housing projects have a back log of needed fixes even though the agency has 1billion dollars in federal money for repairs.
It was reported in the paper that this money would not be used until next year or later. How many jobs are not being filled because of this policy.
It's been reported in other sources that there are other programs through out the country that have money that is not being used and are in bank accounts. More jobs that haven't been created.
Lets go back to the first statement. What happens if there are at least 1 thousand bank accounts with 1 billion dollars of federal money in them. If the feds take that money back it would reduce the deficit by 1/16.
(What is the meaning of take the money back? It's called use it or lose it philosophy.)
What is the meaning of this blog?
(A) The deficits not as bad as those Chicken Littles are proclaiming.
(B) What good is giving out federal money if it's not going to be used.
(C) Stimulus will not work unless the money is used.
(D) All of the above.
(E) None of the above.
It was reported in the paper that this money would not be used until next year or later. How many jobs are not being filled because of this policy.
It's been reported in other sources that there are other programs through out the country that have money that is not being used and are in bank accounts. More jobs that haven't been created.
Lets go back to the first statement. What happens if there are at least 1 thousand bank accounts with 1 billion dollars of federal money in them. If the feds take that money back it would reduce the deficit by 1/16.
(What is the meaning of take the money back? It's called use it or lose it philosophy.)
What is the meaning of this blog?
(A) The deficits not as bad as those Chicken Littles are proclaiming.
(B) What good is giving out federal money if it's not going to be used.
(C) Stimulus will not work unless the money is used.
(D) All of the above.
(E) None of the above.
Monday, September 3, 2012
Steve's barking at being foolish over the debt
Let me write something outrages. The worst thing the US could do is to eliminate it's debt.
I don't hear that explicitly from those running for office or even those people who for some reason were able o get a doctorate in economics and haven't a clue. They seem to be screaming were going to die were going to die, the sky is falling our debt is too high. Of cause these are the same people who profess to be capitalist free market people. Now I'm 99.9999999% sure that the capitalist free market system runs on debt.
Now being a strong believer in the capitalist free market system and a patriotic citizen I'm suggesting we must do what those great present day captains of ( what ever) who run most of our major money making enterprises we must borrow till it hurts.
I don't hear that explicitly from those running for office or even those people who for some reason were able o get a doctorate in economics and haven't a clue. They seem to be screaming were going to die were going to die, the sky is falling our debt is too high. Of cause these are the same people who profess to be capitalist free market people. Now I'm 99.9999999% sure that the capitalist free market system runs on debt.
Now being a strong believer in the capitalist free market system and a patriotic citizen I'm suggesting we must do what those great present day captains of ( what ever) who run most of our major money making enterprises we must borrow till it hurts.
Saturday, September 1, 2012
Steve's barking at Mayor Bloomberg's next social experiment
I'm been trying to track down the rumor that Mayor Bloomberg is going to ban stock quotation machines from the desk of New Yorkers. He will be doing this by having $100000 tax on every machine and computers that show stocks in real time. He is doing this to slow down day trading for as we all know that day trading can be bad for your fiscal health.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)